De Mees, Thierry
December 26, 2018
How can we define whether a work is scientific or pseudo-scientific? Is it the "scientific method" and the content compatible with the mainstream only? Can we find in the "large" journals works that follow the "scientific method" but are nevertheless based on random truths or not directly verified? Can we find studies that completely deny experiences? That distort experiences and conclusions? Who are biased without evidence? Who claim issues that have not been proven? Who makes the ad hoc liaison without direct verification?
0 total records on pages
You are replying to:
Help keep GS Journal progressing to become the most valuable scientific research website on the net!